Comparison of the relation of the ESC 2021 and ESC 2013 definitions of left bundle branch block with clinical and echocardiographic outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Author:

Rijks Jesse1ORCID,Ghossein Mohammed A.2ORCID,Wouters Philippe C.3,Dural Muhammet14ORCID,Maass Alexander H.5ORCID,Meine Mathias3,Kloosterman Mariëlle5,Luermans Justin16,Prinzen Frits W.2ORCID,Vernooy Kevin16,van Stipdonk Antonius M. W.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) Maastricht The Netherlands

2. Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

3. Department of Cardiology University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) Utrecht The Netherlands

4. Department of Cardiology Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Eskişehir Turkey

5. Department of Cardiology, University Groningen University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) Groningen The Netherlands

6. Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Centre (RadboudUMC) Nijmegen The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionWe aimed to investigate the impact of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline changes in left bundle branch block (LBBB) definition on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patient selection and outcomes.MethodsThe MUG (Maastricht, Utrecht, Groningen) registry, consisting of consecutive patients implanted with a CRT device between 2001 and 2015 was studied. For this study, patients with baseline sinus rhythm and QRS duration ≥ 130ms were eligible. Patients were classified according to ESC 2013 and 2021 guideline LBBB definitions and QRS duration. Endpoints were heart transplantation, LVAD implantation or mortality (HTx/LVAD/mortality) and echocardiographic response (LVESV reduction ≥15%).ResultsThe analyses included 1.202, typical CRT patients. The ESC 2021 definition resulted in considerably less LBBB diagnoses compared to the 2013 definition (31.6% vs. 80.9%, respectively). Applying the 2013 definition resulted in significant separation of the Kaplan–Meier curves of HTx/LVAD/mortality (p < .0001). A significantly higher echocardiographic response rate was found in the LBBB compared to the non‐LBBB group using the 2013 definition. These differences in HTx/LVAD/mortality and echocardiographic response were not found when applying the 2021 definition.ConclusionThe ESC 2021 LBBB definition leads to a considerably lower percentage of patients with baseline LBBB then the ESC 2013 definition. This does not lead to better differentiation of CRT responders, nor does this lead to a stronger association with clinical outcomes after CRT. In fact, stratification according to the 2021 definition is not associated with a difference in clinical or echocardiographic outcome, implying that the guideline changes may negatively influence CRT implantation practice with a weakened recommendation in patients that will benefit from CRT.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3