Minimal Compositionality versus Bird Implicatures: two theories of ABC‐D sequences in Japanese tits

Author:

Schlenker Philippe12,Salis Ambre1ORCID,Leroux Maël1,Coye Camille1ORCID,Rizzi Luigi34,Steinert‐Threlkeld Shane5,Chemla Emmanuel6

Affiliation:

1. Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure Institut Jean‐Nicod (ENS‐EHESS‐CNRS), PSL University 29, rue d'Ulm Paris 75005 France

2. Department of Linguistics New York University 10 Washington Place New York NY 10003 USA

3. Collège de France 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot Paris 75005 France

4. CISCL, University of Siena Via Roma 56 Siena 53100 Italy

5. Department of Linguistics University of Washington Guggenheim Hall 4th Floor Box Seattle WA 352425 USA

6. Département d'Etudes Cognitives, LSCP (ENS‐EHESS‐CNRS) Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University Paris France

Abstract

ABSTRACTIt was argued in a series of experimental studies that Japanese tits (Parus minor) have an ABC call that has an alert function, a D call that has a recruitment function, and an ABC‐D call that is compositionally derived from ABC and D, and has a mobbing function. A key conclusion was that ABC‐D differs from the combination of separate utterances of ABC and of D (e.g. as played by distinct but close loudspeakers). While the logic of the argument is arguably sound, no explicit rule has been proposed to derive the meaning of ABC‐D from that of its parts. We compare two analyses. One posits a limited instance of semantic compositionality (‘Minimal Compositionality’); the other does without compositionality, but uses instead a more sophisticated pragmatics (‘Bird Implicatures’). Minimal Compositionality takes the composition of ABC and D to deviate only minimally from what would be found with two independent utterances: ABC means that ‘there is something that licenses an alert’, D means that ‘there is something that licenses recruitment’, and ABC‐D means that ‘there is something that licenses both an alert and recruitment’. By contrast, ABC and D as independent utterances yield something weaker, namely: ‘there is something that licenses an alert, and there is something that licenses recruitment’, without any ‘binding’ across the two utterances. The second theory, Bird Implicatures, only requires that ABC‐D should be more informative than ABC, and/or than D. It builds on the idea, proposed for several monkey species, that a less‐informative call competes with a more informative one (the ‘Informativity Principle’): when produced alone, ABC and D trigger an inference that ABC‐D is false. We explain how both Minimal Compositionality and Bird Implicatures could have evolved, and we compare the predictions of the two theories. Finally, we extend the discussion to some chimpanzee and meerkat sequences that might raise related theoretical problems.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3