Effectiveness of a fourth SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine dose in previously infected individuals from Austria

Author:

Chalupka Alena1,Richter Lukas12,Chakeri Ali13,El‐Khatib Ziad1,Theiler‐Schwetz Verena4,Trummer Christian4,Krause Robert5,Willeit Peter678ORCID,Benka Bernhard1,Ioannidis John P. A.9ORCID,Pilz Stefan4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES) Vienna Austria

2. Institute of Statistics, Graz University of Technology Graz Austria

3. Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

6. Institute of Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

7. Department of Public Health and Primary Care University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

8. Ignaz Semmelweis Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Infection Research Vienna Austria

9. Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Health, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics and Meta‐Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) Stanford University Stanford California USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEvidence is limited on the effectiveness of a fourth vaccine dose against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in populations with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infections. We estimated the risk of COVID‐19 deaths and SARS‐CoV‐2 infections according to vaccination status in previously infected individuals in Austria.MethodsThis is a nationwide retrospective observational study. We calculated age and gender adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID‐19 deaths (primary outcome) and SARS‐CoV‐2 infections (secondary outcome) from 1 November to 31 December 2022, primarily comparing individuals with four versus three vaccine doses. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was calculated as (1‐HR) X 100.ResultsAmong 3,986,312 previously infected individuals, 281,291 (7,1%) had four and 1,545,242 (38.8%) had three vaccinations at baseline. We recorded 69 COVID‐19 deaths and 89,056 SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. rVE for four versus three vaccine doses was −24% (95% CI: −120 to 30) against COVID‐19 deaths, and 17% (95% CI: 14–19) against SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. This latter effect rapidly diminished over time and infection risk with four vaccinations was higher compared to less vaccinated individuals during extended follow‐up until June 2023. Adjusted HR (95% CI) for all‐cause mortality for four versus three vaccinations was 0.79 (0.74–0.85).DiscussionIn previously infected individuals, a fourth vaccination was not associated with COVID‐19 death risk, but with transiently reduced risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and reversal of this effect in longer follow‐up. All‐cause mortality data suggest healthy vaccinee bias.

Funder

Austrian Science Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3