Family based social capital of adults with mild intellectual disabilities supported in 24‐hour residential settings compared to outreach settings

Author:

Giesbers Sanne A. H.1ORCID,Tournier Tess12,Hendriks Alexander H. C.13,van Loon Kathleen4,Quinet Vicky4,Hastings Richard P.56,Jahoda Andrew7ORCID,Embregts Petri J. C. M.1

Affiliation:

1. Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

2. ASVZ Sliedrecht The Netherlands

3. School of Pedagogical and Educational Science, Faculty of Social Sciences Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands

4. Karel de Grote University of Applied Sciences Antwerp Belgium

5. Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research University of Warwick Coventry UK

6. Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Psychological Medicine, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

Abstract

AbstractTo enhance social inclusion of people with (mild) intellectual disabilities, policy tends to focus on increasing their informal supportive networks. Family members, mostly parents, are often the main providers of informal support to people with mild intellectual disabilities. Previous research has shown the utility of social capital as a theoretical framework to examine support in the family relationships of people with mild intellectual disabilities, and has shown that several features of the family‐based social capital of people with mild intellectual disabilities are dependent on support and living arrangements. However, existing research on support and living arrangements does not take the key features of family‐based social capital (i.e., bonding and bridging social capital, reciprocity) into account. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to examine the family‐based social capital of people with mild intellectual disabilities supported in 24‐h residential settings (n = 29) versus outreach support settings (n = 45). All participants were individually interviewed about their family support relationships using the Family Network Method‐Intellectual Disability (FNM‐ID). Data were analyzed quantitatively using social network analyses and group comparisons. No significant differences between the two subgroups were found in the social network measures: the two subgroups did not differ in their experience of bonding and bridging social capital, nor in terms of the experienced reciprocity in their family relationships. However, a few differences in the composition of the family network were found. While people with mild intellectual disabilities in outreach support settings were more likely to include children in their significant family network and to provide support to parents, participants in 24‐h care settings were more likely to report extended family as significant family network members.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3