Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia

Author:

Kinneen Lois1ORCID,Escobar María Paula2ORCID,Hernandez Luis Miguel3ORCID,Thompson Jill4,Ramos‐Pastrana Yardany5ORCID,Córdoba‐Suarez Eric5ORCID,Romero‐Sanchez Miguel3ORCID,Barnes Andrew6ORCID,Quintero Marcela3ORCID,Garratt Michael P. D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sustainable Land Management, School of Agriculture, Policy & Development University of Reading Reading UK

2. Bristol Veterinary School University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) Cali Colombia

4. UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Midlothian UK

5. Universidad de la Amazonia, Grupo de Investigación en Entomología Universidad de la Amazonia (GIEUA), Laboratorio de Entomología (LEUA) Florencia, Caquetá Colombia

6. Department for Rural Economy Environment and Society Edinburgh UK

Abstract

Abstract In the Colombian Amazon, there has been long‐term and sustained loss of primary forest threatening biodiversity and climate change mitigation. Silvopastoral practices that integrate trees into livestock production could help address both local economic and wider environmental challenges. We aimed to assess the effects of silvopastoral practices on invertebrate communities on smallholder farms in Caquetá, Colombia. Using sweep nets and malaise trapping, invertebrate communities were compared between traditional pasture, silvopasture and forest edge habitats. Invertebrate communities collected using sweep nets were contrasting among habitat types, communities were significantly different between traditional pasture and forest edge habitats and diversity and evenness were greatest in forest edges compared to traditional pastures. It appears that silvopasture areas, by supporting similar invertebrate assemblages to both traditional pasture and forest edges, may be acting as an intermediate habitat. When individual invertebrate orders were compared, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera were found in greater abundance in the forest edge habitats, while Hemiptera were more abundant in traditional pasture. Hemipterans are often pests of forage plants in pasture systems and these differences in abundance may have implications for ecosystem services and disservices. Silvopastoral approaches cannot replace the unique biodiversity supported by native forests but could deliver benefits for invertebrate conservation and ecosystem services if integrated into landscapes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Forestry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3