Affiliation:
1. Department of Nutrition Sciences The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA
2. Department of Family and Community Medicine The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA
Abstract
SummaryWhile the “precision nutrition” movement is at an early stage of development, several investigations have compared low‐fat versus carbohydrate (CHO)‐modified diets (i.e., low‐or‐reduced‐CHO, low glycemic index/load diets, and high‐fiber) in people with normal versus impaired glucose metabolism. The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize evidence in support of the hypothesis that CHO‐modified diets are more effective for weight loss among people with impaired glucose metabolism. Fifteen articles were included in this review: seven retrospective analyses of randomized clinical trials and eight prospective randomized clinical trials with prespecified hypotheses related to a diet (low‐fat vs. CHO‐modified) × phenotype (normal vs. impaired) interaction. Evidence in support of the hypothesis was identified in six of seven retrospective and three of eight prospective studies, which led to a recommendation of CHO‐modified diets as a first‐line option for people with impaired glucose metabolism. However, the evidence in support of this recommendation is relatively weak, and dietary prescriptions should consider additional contextual information that may influence overall dietary adherence. Additional and rigorous research using innovative randomized experimental approaches is needed for stronger dietary weight loss recommendations based on pretreatment glycemic status.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Carbohydrates in the context of metabolic diseases;Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care;2024-06-06