Anti‐obesity pharmacological agents for polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis to inform the 2023 international evidence‐based guideline

Author:

Goldberg Alyse1,Graca Sandro23,Liu Jing4,Rao Vibhuti4,Witchel Selma Feldman5,Pena Alexia6,Li Rong7,Mousa Aya8ORCID,Tay Chau Thien89,Pattuwage Loyal8,Teede Helena89ORCID,Yildiz Bulent O.10,Ee Carolyn41112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

2. School of Health and Society, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing University of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton West Midlands UK

3. Department of Research Northern College of Acupuncture York North Yorkshire UK

4. NICM Health Research Institute Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

5. UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

6. Discipline of Paediatrics, Robinson Research Institute The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

7. Department of OB & GYN, Reproductive Medical Center Peking University Third Hospital Beijing China

8. Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

9. Department of Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Monash Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey

11. Translational Health Research Institute Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

12. Caring Futures Institute Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

SummaryThis systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti‐obesity agents for hormonal, reproductive, metabolic, and psychological outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to inform the 2023 update of the International Evidence‐based Guideline on PCOS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL until July 2022 with a 10‐year limit to focus on newer agents. Eleven trials (545 and 451 participants in intervention and control arms respectively, 12 comparisons) were included. On descriptive analyses, most agents improved anthropometric outcomes; liraglutide, semaglutide and orlistat appeared superior to placebo for anthropometric outcomes. Meta‐analyses were possible for two comparisons (exenatide vs. metformin and orlistat + combined oral contraceptive pill [COCP] vs. COCP alone). On meta‐analysis, no differences were identified between exenatide versus metformin for anthropometric, biochemical hyperandrogenism, and metabolic outcomes, other than lower fasting blood glucose more with metformin than exenatide (MD: 0.10 mmol/L, CI 0.02–0.17, I2 = 18%, 2 trials). Orlistat + COCP did not improve metabolic outcomes compared with COCP alone (fasting insulin MD: −8.65 pmol/L, −33.55 to 16.26, I2 = 67%, 2 trials). Published data examining the effects of anti‐obesity agents in women with PCOS are very limited. The role of these agents in PCOS should be a high priority for future research.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3