Sampling strategy matters to accurately estimate response curves' parameters in species distribution models

Author:

Bazzichetto Manuele12ORCID,Lenoir Jonathan3ORCID,Da Re Daniele4ORCID,Tordoni Enrico5ORCID,Rocchini Duccio16ORCID,Malavasi Marco17ORCID,Barták Vojtech1ORCID,Sperandii Marta Gaia28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha Czech Republic

2. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CSIC‐UV‐GV) Valencia Spain

3. UMR CNRS 7058 “Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés” (EDYSAN) Université de Picardie Jules Verne Amiens France

4. Georges Lemaître Center for Earth and Climate Research Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium

5. Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

6. BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy

7. Department of Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Sassari Sassari Italy

8. Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Abstract

AbstractAimAssessing how different sampling strategies affect the accuracy and precision of species response curves estimated by parametric species distribution models.Major Taxa StudiedVirtual plant species.LocationAbruzzo (Italy).Time PeriodTimeless (simulated data).MethodsWe simulated the occurrence of two virtual species with different ecology (generalist vs specialist) and distribution extent. We sampled their occurrence following different sampling strategies: random, stratified, systematic, topographic, uniform within the environmental space (hereafter, uniform) and close to roads. For each sampling design and species, we ran 500 simulations at increasing sampling efforts (total: 42,000 replicates). For each replicate, we fitted a binomial generalised linear model, extracted model coefficients for precipitation and temperature, and compared them with true coefficients from the known species' equation. We evaluated the quality of the estimated response curves by computing bias, variance and root mean squared error (RMSE). Additionally, we (i) assessed the impact of missing covariates on the performance of the sampling approaches and (ii) evaluated the effect of incompletely sampling the environmental space on the uniform approach.ResultsFor the generalist species, we found the lowest RMSE when uniformly sampling the environmental space, while sampling occurrence data close to roads provided the worst performance. For the specialist species, all sampling designs showed comparable outcomes. Excluding important predictors similarly affected all sampling strategies. Sampling limited portions of the environmental space reduced the performance of the uniform approach, regardless of the portion surveyed.Main ConclusionsOur results suggest that a proper estimate of the species response curve can be obtained when the choice of the sampling strategy is guided by the species' ecology. Overall, uniformly sampling the environmental space seems more efficient for species with wide environmental tolerances. The advantage of seeking the most appropriate sampling strategy vanishes when modelling species with narrow realised niches.

Funder

Eesti Teadusagentuur

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3