Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service

Author:

Batterham Philip J.1ORCID,Martin Melonie12,Calear Alison L.1,Cherbuin Nicolas3,Romaniuk Madeline1,Banfield Michelle1,Butterworth Peter34,Burvill Michael5,Massang Daniel5

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

2. Centre of Epidemiology for Policy and Practice, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

3. Department of Health Economics Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health The Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

4. SEED Lifespan, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University Melbourne Australia

5. Department of Veterans' Affairs Australian Government Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOutcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders.ObjectiveInformed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families.MethodTwenty‐nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi‐structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data.ResultsClients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework.ConclusionsFindings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client‐led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3