Patient–clinician interactions in shared diabetes/nephrology consultations – A qualitative observation study

Author:

Christensen Leah Sejrup1ORCID,Bauer Eithne Hayes234ORCID,Primdahl Jette456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital of Southern Denmark Aabenraa Denmark

2. Internal Medicine Research Unit University Hospital of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe) University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

4. Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

5. Hospital Soenderjylland University Hospital of Southern Denmark Aabenraa Denmark

6. The Danish Center for Expertise in Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases University Hospital of Southern Denmark Sønderborg Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations.AimThis project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting.Research MethodsWe performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease.ResultsWe found one over‐arching theme: ‘A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease’ and four subthemes: (1) ‘The medical focal point’ pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) ‘The possibility of negotiations’ illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) ‘Speaking different languages’ displayed how patients used alternative illness‐based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) ‘Perceptions of everyday life’ concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives.ConclusionPatients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings.Short PhrasesShared Outpatient Clinic, Patient–clinician interactions.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3