Young adults with kidney failure lived experiences of kidney replacement therapy decision‐making

Author:

Ofori‐Ansah Sarah1ORCID,Evans Michelle1ORCID,Baillie Lesley1ORCID,Moorley Calvin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Social Care London South Bank University London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundYoung adults living with kidney failure make decisions to select a kidney replacement therapy choice in partnership with healthcare professionals. However, little is known about how they experience kidney replacement therapy treatment decision‐making and the impact this has on their well‐being.ObjectivesTo explore young adults living with kidney failure experiences of treatment decision‐making. The treatment decision‐making investigated is about the choice of dialysis and/or kidney transplant options.DesignA qualitative interpretive hermeneutic phenomenology study.ParticipantsPurposeful sampling was used to recruit young adults with kidney failure from social media, electronic media such as local kidney group websites and word of mouth. Semistructured interviews were conducted with (n = 18) participants aged 18–30 years.ApproachInductive analysis of the data were performed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework.FindingsThe five themes generated were (1) awareness and anticipation of future kidney replacement therapy decision; (2) health information and education; (3) engaging in decision‐making, support and choices; (4) implementation of kidney replacement therapy and transitioning into the new normal life and (5) the impact of decision‐making and choice on well‐being.ConclusionsDecision‐making significantly affected young adults' psychosocial and mental well‐being. Young adults had unmet informational and decisional needs and struggled to cope due to lack of support. A four‐talk model, with an implement talk phase added to the existing three‐talk (team talk, option talk, decision talk) shared decision‐making model, would promote a focus on the implementation of choice and support the transitioning from previous life to long‐term dependence on treatment.

Funder

London South Bank University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3