Ultrafiltration‐induced decrease in relative blood volume is larger in hemodialysis patients with low specific blood volume: Results from a dialysate bolus administration study

Author:

Schmiedecker Michael1,Krenn Simon123ORCID,Waller Maximilian14,Paschen Christopher1,Mussnig Sebastian1ORCID,Niknam Janosch1,Wabel Peter5,Mayer Christopher C.3,Hecking Manfred1,Schneditz Daniel6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine III, Division of Nephrology & Dialysis Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Center for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

3. AIT Austrian Institute of Technology Center for Health & Bioresources, Medical Signal Analysis Vienna Austria

4. Department of Nephrology Klinik Favoriten Vienna Vienna Austria

5. Rosbach Germany

6. Otto Loewi Research Center, Division of Physiology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPrescribing the ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients remains challenging and might benefit from the information on absolute blood volume, estimated by intradialytic dialysate bolus administration. Here, we aimed at determining the relationship between absolute blood volume, normalized for body mass (specific blood volume, Vs), and ultrafiltration‐induced decrease in relative blood volume (∆RBV) as well as clinical parameters including body mass index (BMI).MethodsThis retrospective analysis comprised 77 patients who had their dialysate bolus‐based absolute blood volume extracted routinely with an automated method. Patient‐specific characteristics and ∆RBV were analyzed as a function of Vs, dichotomizing the data above or below a previously proposed threshold of 65 ml/kg for Vs. Statistical methodology comprised descriptive analyses, two‐group comparisons, and correlation analyses.FindingsMedian Vs was 68.6 ml/kg (54.9 ml/kg [Quartile 1], 83.4 ml/kg [Quartile 3]). Relative blood volume decreased by 6.3% (2.6%, 12.2%) over the entire hemodialysis session. Vs correlated inversely with BMI (rs = −0.688, p < 0.001). ∆RBV was 9.8% in the group of patients with Vs <65 ml/kg versus 6.0% in the group of patients with Vs ≥65 ml/kg (p = 0.024). The two groups did not differ significantly regarding their specific ultrafiltration volume, normalized for body mass, which amounted to 34.1 ml/kg and 36.0 ml/kg in both groups, respectively (p = 0.630). ∆RBV correlated inversely with Vs (rs = −0.299, p = 0.008).DiscussionThe present study suggests that patients with higher BMI and lower Vs experience larger blood volume changes, despite similar ultrafiltration requirements. These results underline the clinical plausibility and importance of dialysate bolus‐based absolute blood volume determination in the assessment of target weight, especially in view of a previous study where intradialytic morbid events could be decreased when the target weight was adjusted, based on Vs.

Funder

Vienna Science and Technology Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nephrology,Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3