Efficacy of 1‐kestose supplementation in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pilot study

Author:

Ikegami Shuji1ORCID,Nakamura Masanao1ORCID,Honda Takashi1ORCID,Yamamura Takeshi1,Maeda Keiko2ORCID,Sawada Tsunaki2,Ishikawa Eri1,Yamamoto Kenta1ORCID,Furune Satoshi1,Ishikawa Takuya1,Furukawa Kazuhiro1,Ohno Eizaburo1,Ishigami Masatoshi1,Kinoshita Fumie3,Kadota Yoshihiro4,Tochio Takumi4,Shimomura Yoshiharu5,Hirooka Yoshiki6,Kawashima Hiroki1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan

2. Department of Endoscopy Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan

3. Department of Advanced Medicine Nagoya University Hospital Nagoya Japan

4. B Food Science Co., Ltd. Chita Aichi Japan

5. Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chubu University Kasugai Japan

6. Department of Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas Diseases Fujita Health University School of Medicine Toyoake Aichi Japan

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundUlcerative colitis involves an excessive immune response to intestinal bacteria. Whether administering prebiotic 1‐kestose is effective for active ulcerative colitis remains controversial.AimsThis randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pilot trial investigated the efficacy of 1‐kestose against active ulcerative colitis.MethodsForty patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomly treated with 1‐kestose (N = 20) or placebo (maltose, N = 20) orally for 8 weeks in addition to the standard treatment. The Lichtiger clinical activity index and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity were determined. Faecal samples were analysed to evaluate the gut microbiome and metabolites.ResultsThe clinical activity index at week 8 was significantly lower in the 1‐kestose group than in the placebo group (3.8 ± 2.7 vs. 5.6 ± 2.1, p = 0.026). Clinical remission and response rates were higher in the 1‐kestose group than in the placebo group (remission: 55% vs. 20%, p = 0.048; response: 60% vs. 25%, p = 0.054). The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity at week 8 was not significantly different (2.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.5 ± 1.6, p = 0.145). Faecal analysis showed significantly reduced alpha‐diversity in the 1‐kestose group, with a decreased relative abundance of several bacteria, including Ruminococcus gnavus group. The short‐chain fatty acid levels were not significantly different between the groups. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups.DiscussionOral 1‐kestose is well tolerated and provides clinical improvement for patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis through modulation of the gut microbiome.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3