Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA
2. Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA
3. Department of Psychological Sciences University of Connecticut Storz CT USA
4. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases Leipzig University Medical Center Leipzig Germany
Abstract
BackgroundCognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence‐supported treatment for adolescents with binge‐eating disorder (BED). Executive dysfunctions, which are associated with binge eating and elevated body weight in youth, may undermine CBT outcomes by making it difficult for youth to engage with or adhere to treatment, including recalling and/or implementing intervention strategies in real‐world contexts.MethodsWe assessed 73 adolescents [82.2% female; Mage = 15.0 ± 2.5 year; M baseline standardized body mass index (zBMI) = 1.9 ± 1.0 kg/m2] with BED at baseline, posttreatment, 6‐, 12‐, and 24‐month follow‐up. Linear mixed models examined the effects of baseline executive functioning (EF) on loss of control (LOC) eating and weight change following CBT. Linear and logistic regressions probed associations between EF, attendance, and attrition.ResultsMore impulsive decision‐making, as reflected in higher baseline scores on the Iowa Gambling Task, predicted better attendance (β = .07; p = .019) and more frequent LOC eating following treatment (β = .12; p = .017). Lower cognitive flexibility, as reflected in lower baseline T‐scores on the Comprehensive Trail Making Test complex sequencing index, predicted higher zBMI following treatment (β = −.03; p = .003). Inhibition, concentration, attention, and parent‐reported EF behavior symptoms were not associated with outcome, attendance, or attrition.ConclusionsMore impulsive decision‐making and lower cognitive flexibility were associated with suboptimal response to CBT for BED, although findings should be interpreted with caution in light of the sample size and waitlist control design. Future research should examine whether strengthening EF could improve eating and weight outcomes among adolescents with BED who have lower pre‐treatment EF.
Funder
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases