Lessons from professional nursing associations' policy advocacy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic: An interpretive description

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundProfessional nursing associations across jurisdictions engaged in significant policy advocacy during the COVID‐19 pandemic to support nurses, the public and health systems. While professional nursing associations have a long history of engaging in policy advocacy, scholars have rarely critically examined this important function.PurposeThe purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to examine how professional nursing associations engage in the process of policy advocacy and (b) to develop knowledge specific to policy advocacy in the context of a global pandemic.MethodsThis study was conducted using interpretive description. A total of eight individuals from four professional nursing associations (two local, one national and one international) participated. Data sources included semi‐structured interviews conducted between October 2021 and December 2021 and internal and external documents produced by organizations. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently. Within‐case analysis was conducted prior to cross‐case comparisons.FindingsSix key themes were developed to illustrate the lessons learned from these organizations including their organization's role in supporting a wide audience (professional nursing associations as a compass); the scope of their policy priorities (bridging the gaps between issues and solutions), the breadth of their advocacy strategies (top down, bottom up and everything in between), the factors influencing their decision‐making (looking in and looking out), their evaluation practices (focus on contribution, not attribution) and the importance of capitalizing on windows of opportunity.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into the nature of policy advocacy carried out by professional nursing associations.ImpactThe findings suggest the need for those leading this important function to think critically about their role in supporting a wide range of audiences, the breadth and depth of their policy priorities and advocacy strategies, the factors that influence their decision‐making, and the ways in which their policy advocacy work can be evaluated to move towards greater influence and impact.