Human factors considerations in distance simulation: A nominal group technique application

Author:

Bajwa Maria1,Herx‐Weaver Anne123,Baily Shannon45,Ray Jessica6,Park Yoon Soo78,Palaganas Janice1,Ahmed Rami19ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MGH Institute of Health Professions Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Fitchburg State University Fitchburg Massachusetts USA

3. UMass Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

4. Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

5. Morsani College of Medicine University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

6. University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA

7. Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe pandemic‐driven surge in global distance simulation (DS) adoption highlighted the need for effective educator training. A literature search identified the gap regarding human factors (HF) considerations for the professional development of DS practitioners. This study addresses this gap by applying HF principles to guide educators in developing and delivering evidence‐based DS.MethodsThis was a consensus‐gathering, three‐phase study using the nominal group technique (NGT) in the first phase, qualitative thematic analysis with member checking in the second phase and external expert opinion in the third. A dichotomised approach was used to divide the post‐consensus discussion survey results into an agreement and non‐agreement for quantitative analysis.ResultsThe results of the quantitative analysis identified the following needs: developing a conceptual framework for DS, tailoring the technical aspect to the educational objectives, investigating learner engagement, training faculty at an earlier stage and identifying at‐risk students. Qualitative results identified primary themes of technology, people and outcome measurements. Key aspects of technology were identified as system‐ and programme‐fit and resource considerations. Outcome measurement highlights the need for increased measurement and research at all levels of DS.DiscussionSpecific HF focal points include human–technology interaction and learning outcome assessment within the DS context. Incorporating HF principles throughout the DS process, from inception to outcome evaluation, promises substantial benefits for both learners and educators. This approach empowers both learners and educators, fostering a dynamic and enriched educational environment and improved learning experiences.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference29 articles.

1. PalaganasJ BajwaM LababidiH MortonA MorrisM MosherC et al.The creation of healthcare distance simulation faculty development guidelines (phase I). The Institute for Interprofessional Innovations and the Healthcare Distance Simulation Collaboration.2022.

2. Development of Distance Simulation Educator Guidelines in Healthcare

3. Closing the gap: a call for a common blueprint for remote distance telesimulation

4. Adaptive change in simulation education: Comparison of effectiveness of a communication skill curriculum on death notification using in‐person methods versus a digital communication platform

5. The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID‐19 pandemic: results of an international survey;Buléon C;Adv Simul (Lond),2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrating Human Factors to Enhance Healthcare Distance Simulation;Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3