Affiliation:
1. Department of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka City Fukuoka Japan
2. Department of General Internal Medicine Local Incorporated Administrative Agency Saga‐Ken Medical Centre Koseikan Saga Japan
3. Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka City Fukuoka Japan
4. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka City Fukuoka Japan
Abstract
ABSTRACTAims/IntroductionAlthough the association between dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid (BP) has begun to be established, some studies have suggested there are risk differences among DPP‐4 inhibitors. We conducted a population‐based cohort study to examine the risk differences.Materials and MethodsUsing the claims databases of the Fukuoka Prefecture Wide‐Area Association of Latter‐Stage Elderly Healthcare between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare patients receiving one DPP‐4 inhibitor with those who were prescribed another antidiabetic drug. The primary outcome was an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the development of bullous pemphigoid during a 3‐year follow‐up. The secondary outcome was the development of BP requiring systemic steroids immediately after the diagnosis. These were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.ResultsThe study comprised 33,241 patients, of which 0.26% (n = 88) developed bullous pemphigoid during follow‐up. The percentages of patients with bullous pemphigoid who required immediate systemic steroid treatment was 0.11% (n = 37). We analyzed four DPP‐4 inhibitors: sitagliptin, vildagliptin, alogliptin, and linagliptin. Vildagliptin and linagliptin raised the risk of BP significantly (primary outcome, vildagliptin, HR 2.411 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.325–4.387], linagliptin, HR 2.550 [95% CI 1.266–5.136], secondary outcome, vildagliptin HR 3.616 [95% CI 1.495–8.745], linagliptin HR 3.556 [95% CI 1.262–10.024]). A statistically significant risk elevation was not observed with sitagliptin and alogliptin (primary outcome, sitagliptin, HR 0.911 [95% CI 0.508–1.635], alogliptin, HR 1.600 [95% CI 0.714–3.584], secondary outcome, sitagliptin, HR 1.192 [95% CI 0.475–2.992], alogliptin, HR 2.007 [95% CI 0.571–7.053]).ConclusionsNot all the DPP‐4 inhibitors could induce bullous pemphigoid significantly. Therefore, the association warrants further investigations before generalization.
Subject
General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference54 articles.
1. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare.The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan 2016.2017. Available online:https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/h28-houkoku.htmlAccessed August 27 2022.
2. Achieving glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A critical comparison of current options;Du Y‐F;Clin Interv Aging,2014
3. Comparative Effectiveness for Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Diabetes
4. Comparative Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献