Eicosapentaenoic acid versus placebo as adjunctive therapy in chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Mohammadnezhad Ghader12ORCID,Assarzadegan Farhad13ORCID,Koosha Mohsen14ORCID,Esmaily Hadi15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Development Center Imam Hossein Educational Hospital, shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

2. Student Research Committee, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

3. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Imam Hussain Hospital Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.BackgroundChronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti‐inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.MethodsA randomized, blinded, placebo‐controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test‐6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).ResultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test‐6 in the EPA and placebo groups was −6.96 (3.34) and −4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) −9.76 (4.15) and −4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0–4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0–6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: −0.76 [1.13] and –0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.ConclusionsThis study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3