The impact of fear of attacks on pain‐related disability in cluster headache: Insights from the fear avoidance model

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study utilized the theoretical framework of the “fear avoidance model” (FAM) and investigated the role of fear of attack in pain‐related disability. To this end, a measurement specific to cluster headache (CH) was used to investigate whether fear of attacks, alongside attack frequency, is a significant predictor of pain‐related disability in CH.BackgroundCluster headache substantially impacts daily functioning, yet empirical research exploring specific contributing factors is limited.MethodsA cross‐sectional online survey was undertaken in patients with CH, gathering sociodemographic, clinical data, and responses on the Cluster Headache Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale.ResultsAnalysis of data from 640 patients (chronic CH: 287/640 [44.8%]; female: 264/640 [41.3%]; male: 373/640 [58.3%]; gender diverse: three of 640 [0.5%]; age range: 18–86 years; mean [standard deviation] Cluster Headache Scales subscale disability score: 36.9 [9.8]; out of 869 respondents) revealed that both attack frequency and fear of attacks significantly predicted pain‐related disability (p < 0.001, percentage of variance explained: R2 = 0.24). More variance was explained by fear of attacks (R2 = 0.22) than by attack frequency (R2 = 0.02). This relationship remained significant even when controlling for depression and anxiety, which were also identified as independent predictors of pain‐related disability (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.44).ConclusionThis study emphasizes the relevance of psychological factors in CH‐related disability. Fear of attacks was found to be an independent predictor, while attack frequency was of minor relevance. Empirical investigation of the FAM in CH could improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying disability and contribute to the development of CH‐specific interventions.