Psychometric evaluation of Suicide Management Competency Scale for nursing students: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Lu Chueh‐Fen1ORCID,Beckstead Jason W.2,Ye Jia‐You34ORCID,Yang Chiu Yueh5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Chang Gung University of Science and Technology & Associate Researcher at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Taiwan

2. College of Public Health University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

3. College of Medicine, School of Nursing Chang Gung University Taoyuan City Taiwan

4. College of Nursing, School of Nursing Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan

5. College of Nursing National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei Taiwan

Abstract

AbstractSuicide management skills are essential for nursing students, as they are often the initial healthcare contact for individuals at risk of suicide. Recognising signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour is critical for initiating timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and access the psychometric evaluation of the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS) for nursing students. A first draft of the SMCS was initially developed following literature and focus group, and a scale containing 28 items was constructed. We recruited 216 participants from two nursing schools. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency reliability was determined with Cronbach's alpha, and test–retest reliability was examined with intra‐class correlation. After four rounds of EFA and item analysis, we reduced the number of items to 16. We deleted 12 items, including 4 items for communalities less than 0.40, 3 items for cross‐loading, 3 items for factor loading less than 0.40, and 2 items for low corrected item–total correlation. The final 16‐item SMCS resulted in three subscales, which explained 55.813% of the total variance: emotional challenges in suicide risk assessment, delivering suicide interventions, and suicide risk nursing competence and confidence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.854 for the total score and 0.748 to 0.847 for the subscales. The newly developed SMCS was found to have good reliability and validity, suggesting that this scale could be used to evaluate nursing students' perceived competency in managing suicide, which might help cultivate competence in nurses' ability to effectively manage and prevent suicide, thus contributing to saving lives.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference48 articles.

1. A practical approach to the assessment and quantification of content validity

2. American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2022)Competencies for nurse: Assessment and management of inpatient suicide risk.https://www.apna.org/news/apna‐position‐statement‐competencies‐for‐nurse‐assessment‐and‐management‐of‐inpatient‐suicide‐risk/

3. Assessing cross-cultural validity of scales: A methodological review and illustrative example

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3