Affiliation:
1. Dermatology Clinic University La Sapienza Rome Italy
2. Dermatology Clinic Catholic University Rome Italy
3. Dermatology Clinic University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
4. Ospedale S. Maria Nuova – IRCCS Reggio Emilia Italy
5. Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties Alcalá de Henares University Madrid Spain
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionThis study describes a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled, open‐label study with three arms aimed at studying the differences between: [Cnt], self‐administered sun protection; [T], topical treatment; and [TO], topical + oral treatment; for the management of Actinic Keratosis (AK) in a cohort of subjects of advanced age displaying severe actinic damage (SAD).MethodsTreatments administered to groups [T] and [TO] had a common component, which is a botanical extract, Fernblock, with demonstrated photoprotective activity.ResultsIn total, 131 subjects were distributed randomly in the three groups, and followed up clinically at three separate time points, beginning of the study (t = 0) and after 6 and 12 months. Analysis of clinical data and examination using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) revealed that group [T] and [TO] displayed decreased clinical AK and field cancerization parameters, including the number of new lesions, and reduced the need for additional interventions in these patients. RCM revealed normalization of the keratinocyte layer. Improvements in AK and field cancerization parameters were greatest in the group [TO], suggesting that topical and oral photoprotection improves the clinical and anatomical outcome compared to control conditions.ConclusionsThe combination of topical and oral immune photoprotection provides an advantage compared to topical photoprotection alone.
Subject
Dermatology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献