Designing an observation protocol for professional development providers and mentors working with scientific inquiry‐supported classroom settings

Author:

Unver Ayse Oguz1ORCID,Okulu Hasan Zuhtu1ORCID,Bektas Onur1ORCID,Yilmaz Yasemin Ozdem2ORCID,Muslu Nilay1ORCID,Senler Burcu3ORCID,Arabacioglu Sertac4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Science Education Mugla Sitki Kocman University Mugla Turkey

2. Early Childhood Teacher Education Mugla Sitki Kocman University Mugla Turkey

3. Primary Teacher Education Mugla Sitki Kocman University Mugla Turkey

4. Science Education Trakya University Edirne Turkey

Abstract

AbstractSeveral observation protocols in different theoretical frameworks and components have been designed and validated by teacher trainers and professional development providers to capture and categorize observational data on the characteristics and level of inquiry in science practices. However, certain constraints limit their wide use, such as the neglect of certain indicators of scientific inquiry, the scoring of just summative goals, or the necessity for extensive observer training. The present study, therefore, aims to propose a tool that assists professional development providers and mentors in diagnosing the closeness of practices to scientific inquiry in the context of various settings, from traditional didactic lectures to scientific inquiry, making it easily operational for self and peer evaluations as well as 360‐degree video feedback. The method concentrated on multiple observations provides supportive evidence about the tool's internal consistency coefficient, the relationship between its components, and the inter‐rater reliability coefficient between multiple scorers. The results highlight that the tool, which includes the components of course structure, course overview, and teacher–student communication, has the potential to contribute to the growing library of observation protocols.

Funder

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

Publisher

Wiley

Reference42 articles.

1. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research

2. Beerer K. &Bodzin A.(2004).Promoting inquiry‐based science instruction: The validation of the science teacher inquiry rubric (STIR).Paper Presented at the 2004 Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) Annual Meeting Nashville TN January 8–11.

3. Bergman G. Borda C. S. Ergazaki M. Harlen W. Kotul'áková K. Pascucci A. Schoultz J. Transetti C. &Zoldozova K.(2012).Tools for enhancing inquiry in science education tools for enhancing inquiry in science education.http://www.fibonacci-project.eu/

4. The development and validation of The Inquiry Science Observation Coding Sheet

5. THE INQUIRY SCIENCE IMPLEMENTATION SCALE: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3