Is it possible to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from intra‐articular corticosteroid injections? A systematic review

Author:

Shekleton Florence E.1ORCID,Donovan Richard L.2ORCID,Wylde Vikki23ORCID,Whitehouse Michael R.23

Affiliation:

1. Royal United Hospital Avon UK

2. Musculoskeletal Research Unit University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol Bristol UK

Abstract

AbstractAimIntra‐articular corticosteroid injections (IACIs) can reduce osteoarthritis‐related pain, with differing levels of response across patient groups. This systematic review investigates what is known about the positive and negative predictors of outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis who undergo IACIs.MethodsWe systematically searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to May 2023 for studies that evaluated patients undergoing IACIs for osteoarthritis and reported on predictors of outcomes in these patients.ResultsEight studies were included. Two were placebo‐controlled trials, six were observational studies. Due to the heterogeneity of outcomes and variables between the studies, it was not possible to pool the results for formal meta‐analysis. Higher baseline pain, older age, higher BMI, lower range of movement, higher Kellgren‐Lawrence radiographic score, joint effusion, and aspiration were shown to be predictors of a positive response to IACIs in some of the included studies. However, other studies showed no difference in response with these variables, or a negative correlation with response. Sex, smoking, mental health status, hypertension/ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, duration of symptoms, and socioeconomic status did not demonstrate any correlation with the prediction of positive or negative outcomes after IACIs.ConclusionSeveral patient features have been identified as positive predictors of outcomes following IACIs. However, this systematic review has identified inconsistent and variable findings across the existing literature. Further research with standardization of IACI administration and outcome measures is required to facilitate further analysis of the reliability and significance of predictive factors for response to IACIs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3