Affiliation:
1. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine Kaohsiung Taiwan
2. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences National Sun Yat‐sen University Kaohsiung Taiwan
3. Center for Mitochondrial Research and Medicine Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
4. Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
5. Department of Internal Medicine Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a major risk factor for osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures. We aimed to elucidate the role of treatment choices among osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures.MethodologyWe utilized the Chang‐Gung Research Database to assess the risks of osteoporosis/osteoporotic fractures among independently treated RA patients, using retrospective time‐to‐event outcomes analysis.ResultsA total of 3509 RA patients with a mean of 63.1 ± 8.6 years were analyzed. Among all, 1300 RA patients (37%) were diagnosed with newly diagnosed osteoporosis. The crude incidence of newly diagnosed osteoporosis was the highest among those treated with other conventional disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs; 74.1 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 66.0–82.3), followed by those with a non‐treatment period (68 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 63.1–72.9), methotrxate (MTX) monotherapy (60.7 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 41.2–80.3), MTX plus other cDMARDs (51.9 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 43.4–60.3), and abatacept/rituximab (48.6 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 14.9–82.3). The lowest crude incidence was found in patients treated with anti‐TNFi biologics (40.4 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 28.6–52.2) and other biologic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; 40.1 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 8.0–72.1). A total of 270 patients (20.8%) suffered from an incident fracture during follow‐ups. The crude incidence of fracture was the highest among those treated with abatacept/rituximab (49.0 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 6.0–91.9), followed by those with non‐treatment periods (24.3 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 19.3–29.4), other cDMARDs (24.2 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 18.1–30.2), anti‐TNFi biologics (20.2 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 8.8–31.6). Other bDMARDs (13.3 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 0–39.2), MTX mono (12.5 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 0.3–24.8), and MTX plus other cDMARDs (11.4 events/1000‐PYs, 95%CI 5.4–17.4) were low incidences.ConclusionThe treatment option has emerged as a critical determinant in the context of future osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risks among RA. These findings offer a valuable resource for clinicians, empowering them to tailor bespoke treatment strategies for RA patients, thereby mitigating the potential for future osteoporosis and fractures.
Funder
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献