Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology

Author:

Branney Peter E.1ORCID,Brooks Joanna2ORCID,Kilby Laura3ORCID,Newman Kristina4ORCID,Norris Emma56ORCID,Pownall Madeleine7ORCID,Talbot Catherine V.8ORCID,Treharne Gareth J.9ORCID,Whitaker Candice M.10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Management, Law & Social Sciences Department of Psychology School of Social Sciences University of Bradford Bradford UK

2. Manchester Centre for Health Psychology Division of Psychology and Mental Health University of Manchester Manchester UK

3. Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK

4. Department of Psychology Nottingham Trent University Nottingham UK

5. Division of Global Health Department of Health Sciences Brunel University London London UK

6. Centre for Behaviour Change University College London London UK

7. School of Psychology University of Leeds Leeds UK

8. Department of Psychology Bournemouth University Poole UK

9. Te Tari Whakamātau Hinekaro/Department of Psychology Te Whare Wānanga o Ōtāgo/The University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand (Aotearoa)

10. Faculty of Social and Health Sciences School of Psychology and Therapeutic Studies Leeds Trinity University Leeds UK

Abstract

AbstractPrinciples and applications of open science (also referred to as open research or open scholarship) in psychology have emerged in response to growing concerns about the replicability, transparency, reproducibility, and robustness of psychological research alongside global moves to open science in many fields. Our objective in this paper is to inform ways of collectively constructing open science practices and systems that are appropriate to, and get the best out of, the full range of qualitative and mixed‐method approaches used in psychology. We achieve this by describing three areas of open research practice (contributorship, pre‐registration, and open data) and explore how and why qualitative researchers might consider engaging with these in ways that are compatible with a qualitative research paradigm. We argue it is crucial that open research practices do not (even inadvertently) exclude qualitative research, and that qualitative researchers reflect on how we can meaningfully engage with open science in psychology.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3