Surrogate decision‐makers from historically marginalized populations have lower levels of preparedness for care planning

Author:

Li Lingsheng1ORCID,Barnes Deborah E.12,Nouri Sarah3ORCID,Shi Ying14,Volow Aiesha M.1,Feuz Mariko5,Li Brookelle H.1,Sudore Rebecca L.14

Affiliation:

1. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

2. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco California USA

3. Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

4. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System San Francisco California USA

5. University of Iowa‐Des Moines Internal Medicine Residency Program Des Moines Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSurrogate preparedness for medical decision‐making is an important part of care planning. This study examined preparedness and engagement among historically marginalized surrogates.MethodsSurrogates were included if they were named medical decision‐makers by patients ≥55 years at a San Francisco safety‐net and Veterans Affairs hospital. We assessed preparedness for medical decision‐making by asking if surrogates had been formally asked to be the medical decision‐maker, if patients had discussed medical wishes with surrogates, and if the surrogate role and these medical wishes had been documented. We assessed surrogate confidence and readiness using a modified Surrogate ACP Engagement Survey. We used Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests to measure the association of engagement scores with surrogate characteristics.ResultsOf 422 surrogates, their mean age was 53 years (SD ±14.5), 73% were from minoritized groups, 38% were Spanish‐speaking, and 15% had limited health literacy. For preparedness outcomes, 13% of surrogates were not formally asked to play this role, 46% reported the patient had not discussed end‐of‐life medical wishes, and 51% reported there had been no formal documentation of the surrogate role. Surrogates reported higher confidence 4.43/5 (SD ± 0.64) than readiness 3.70 (1.22) for decision‐making (p < 0.001). Confidence and readiness scores were lower among historically marginalized participants.ConclusionMore resources are needed to prepare surrogate decision‐makers from historically marginalized communities for discussing patient's goals of care and treatment preferences.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3