Affiliation:
1. Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis Davis California USA
2. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell University Ithaca New York USA
3. VCA Canada Central Victoria Veterinary Hospital Victoria British Columbia Canada
4. Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
5. University Library University of California, Davis Davis California USA
6. Robertson Library University of Prince Edward Island Charlottetown Prince Edward Island Canada
7. Department of Small animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo systematically review evidence and devise treatment recommendations for basic life support (BLS) in dogs and cats and to identify critical knowledge gaps.DesignStandardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to BLS following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by 2 Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by BLS Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co‐Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk to benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.SettingTransdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.ResultsTwenty questions regarding animal position, chest compression point and technique, ventilation strategies, as well as the duration of CPR cycles and chest compression pauses were examined, and 32 treatment recommendations were formulated. Out of these, 25 addressed chest compressions and 7 informed ventilation during CPR. The recommendations were founded predominantly on very low quality of evidence and expert opinion. These new treatment recommendations continue to emphasize the critical importance of high‐quality, uninterrupted chest compressions, with a modification suggested for the chest compression technique in wide‐chested dogs. When intubation is not possible, bag–mask ventilation using a tight‐fitting facemask with oxygen supplementation is recommended rather than mouth‐to‐nose ventilation.ConclusionsThese updated RECOVER BLS treatment recommendations emphasize continuous chest compressions, conformation‐specific chest compression techniques, and ventilation for all animals. Very low quality of evidence due to absence of clinical data in dogs and cats consistently compromised the certainty of recommendations, emphasizing the need for more veterinary research in this area.
Funder
Zoetis
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health
Reference162 articles.
1. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; pediatric life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; and first aid task forces;Berg KM;Circulation,2023
2. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care;Topjian AA;Circulation,2020
3. RECOVER evidence and knowledge gap analysis on veterinary CPR. Part 3: basic life support;Hopper K;J Vet Emerg Crit Care,2012