Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: does the anastomotic configuration affect short‐term outcomes?

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesRight hemicolectomy is a common colorectal operation for resection of cancers of the right colon. The ileocolic anastomosis may be created using a stapled end‐to‐side, stapled side‐to‐side or handsewn technique. Anastomotic leak and post‐operative bleeding are uncommon but serious causes of morbidity and mortality, while post‐operative ileus contributes to prolonged length of stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in short‐term outcomes between different anastomotic configurations following right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study using data from the Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), including 94 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand, of all patients who underwent right hemicolectomy or extended right hemicolectomy for colon cancer with formation of a primary anastomosis between 2007 and 2021.ResultsWe included 8164 patients in the analysis. There was no significant difference in rates of anastomotic leak and anastomotic bleeding based on anastomotic technique. A stapled end‐to‐side anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of post‐operative ileus than stapled side‐to‐side anastomosis (6.5% vs. 7.2%; P = 0.03).ConclusionBoth handsewn and stapled anastomosis techniques may be utilized for oncologic right hemicolectomy, with comparable rates of anastomotic leak and post‐operative bleeding. Stapled end‐to‐side anastomosis resulted in lower rates of prolonged ileus compared to stapled side‐to‐side anastomoses.