Predicting verdicts using pre-trial attitudes and standard of proof-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Predicting verdicts using pre-trial attitudes and standard of proof

Published:2013-12-26 Issue:1 Volume:21 Page:95-110
ISSN:1355-3259
Container-title:Legal and Criminological Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Leg Crim Psychol

Author:

Lundrigan Samantha¹,Dhami Mandeep K.²,Mueller-Johnson Katrin³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences; Anglia Ruskin University; Cambridge UK

2. Department of Psychology; University of Middlesex; London UK

3. Institute of Criminology; Cambridge University; Cambridge UK

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12043/fullpdf

Reference49 articles.

1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations;Baron;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986

2. Mr Prejudice, Miss Sympathy and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring techniques to the problem of jury bias;Boehm;Wisconsin Law Review,1968

3. The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?;Bornstein;Law and Human Behavior,1999

4. Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology;Bornstein;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2011

5. The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials;Butler;Behavioural Sciences and the Law,2007

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Error Aversions and Due Process;Michigan Law Review;2023

2. Communicating uncertainty using words and numbers;Trends in Cognitive Sciences;2022-06

3. Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making;Medicine, Science and the Law;2022-02-17

4. Quantifying an implicit legal threshold and mental representations of ‘Innocent:’ a comparison of implicit and theoretical thresholds for a legal decision;The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology;2021-05-17

5. Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors;Psychiatry, Psychology and Law;2021-05-04