Development of theoretically informed audit and feedback: An exemplar from a complex implementation strategy to improve asthma self‐management in UK primary care

Author:

McClatchey Kirstie1ORCID,Sheldon Aimee1,Steed Liz2,Sheringham Jessica3,Holmes Steve4,Preston Megan5,Appiagyei Francis56,Price David67,Taylor Stephanie J. C.2,Pinnock Hilary1,

Affiliation:

1. Usher Institute The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

2. Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK

3. Department of Applied Health Research University College London London UK

4. The Park Medical Practice Shepton Mallet UK

5. Optimum Patient Care Cambridge UK

6. Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Singapore Singapore

7. Division of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

Abstract

AbstractRationaleAudit and feedback is an evidence‐based implementation strategy, but studies reporting the use of theory to guide design elements are limited.Aims and ObjectivesWithin the context of a programme of research aiming to improve the implementation of supported asthma self‐management in UK primary care (IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self‐management as RouTine [IMP2ART]), we aimed to design and develop theoretically‐informed audit and feedback that highlighted supported asthma self‐management provision and areas for improvement in primary care general practices.MethodAligned with the Medical Research Council (MRC) complex intervention framework, the audit and feedback was developed in three phases: (1) Development: literature and theory exploration, and prototype audit and feedback design; (2) Feasibility: eliciting feedback on the audit and feedback from general practice staff (n = 9); (3) Prepiloting: delivering the audit and feedback within the IMP2ART implementation strategy (incorporating patient and professional resources and an asthma review template) and eliciting clinician feedback (n = 9).ResultsAudit and feedback design was guided by and mapped to existing literature suggestions and theory (e.g., Theoretical Domains Framework, Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy). Feedback on the prototype audit and feedback confirmed feasibility but identified some refinements (a need to highlight supporting self‐management and importance of asthma action plans). Prepiloting informed integration with other IMP2ART programme strategies (e.g., patient resources and professional education).ConclusionWe conclude that a multistage development process including theory exploration and mapping, contributed to the design and delivery of the audit and feedback. Aligned with the MRC framework, the IMP2ART strategy (incorporating the audit and feedback) is now being tested in a UK‐wide cluster randomised controlled trial.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference32 articles.

1. Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care

2. Strategies that promote sustainability in quality improvement activities for chronic disease management in healthcare settings: a practical perspective;Evans A;Qual Prim Care,2020

3. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

4. Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals’ practice—an overview of reviews

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3