Functional electrical stimulation during walking in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized cross‐over trial

Author:

Moll Irene123ORCID,Marcellis Rik G. J.4,Fleuren Sabine M.4,Coenen Marcel L. P.5,Senden Rachel H. J.4,Willems Paul J. B.2,Speth Lucianne A. W. M.5,Witlox M. Adhiambo6,Meijer Kenneth2,Vermeulen R. Jeroen13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands

2. Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands

3. Department of Neurology Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands

4. Department of Physiotherapy Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands

5. Adelante Center of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology the Netherlands

6. Department of Orthopedics Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimTo study if functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the peroneal nerve, which activates dorsiflexion, can improve body functions, activities, and participation and could be an effective alternative treatment in individuals with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP).MethodA randomized cross‐over trial was performed in 25 children with unilateral spastic CP (classified in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II) aged 4 to 18 years (median age at inclusion 9 years 8 months, interquartile range = 7 years–13 years 8 months), 15 patients were male. The study consisted of two 12‐week blocks of treatment, that is, conventional treatment (ankle foot orthosis [AFO] or adapted shoes) and FES, separated by a 6‐week washout period. Outcome measures included the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS), the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life questionnaire, and a three‐dimensional gait analysis.ResultsEighteen patients completed the trial. The proportion of GAS goals achieved was not significantly higher in the FES versus the conventional treatment phase (goal 1p = 0.065; goal 2p = 1.00). When walking while stimulated with FES, ankle dorsiflexion during mid‐swing decreased over time (p = 0.006, average decrease of 4.8° with FES), with a preserved increased ankle range of motion compared to conventional treatment (p < 0.001, mean range of motion with FES +10.1° compared to AFO). No changes were found in the standard physical examination or regarding satisfaction with orthoses and feelings about the ability to dress yourself. In four patients, FES therapy failed; in 12 patients FES therapy continued after the trial.InterpretationFES is not significantly worse than AFO; however, patient selection is critical, and a testing period and thorough follow‐up are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3