Deprescribing Tool for Older PeoPle with Limited‐life Expectancy (De‐TOPPLE) version 1: Development and validation using a modified Delphi technique

Author:

Shrestha Shakti1ORCID,Poudel Arjun2ORCID,Steadman Kathryn J.1ORCID,Nissen Lisa M.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. School of Clinical Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Centre for the Business and Economics of Health The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractDeprescribing decision making in older adults with limited life expectancy is often challenging for clinicians. We aimed to develop and validate a Deprescribing Tool for Older People with Limited‐life Expectancy (De‐TOPPLE). Modified Delphi technique was used to gain experts' consensus on the tool and further develop using their feedback. Experts [Round‐1 (n = 13), Round‐2 (n = 7)] had clinical and/or research background on geriatric medicine, geriatrics, family medicine or pharmacotherapy. Round‐1 consensus was achieved on approach taken by the tool to evaluate risk and benefit; distinguishing medications as preventive, symptom control or dual–purpose; referring to established deprescribing process; stepwise approach to deprescribing; and the overall concept. Common feedback was to reflect upon harm‐benefit analysis, distinguish medication types earlier, qualify adverse events, use time‐to‐benefit (TTB), prioritise symptom relief, monitor post‐deprescribing, include shared decision making and define terms for clinical familiarisation. After tool update, Round‐2 consensus was achieved on usability in clinical setting, flexibility of implicit judgement, ceasing preventive medication with inadequate TTB, ceasing symptom control medication with inadequate symptom relief, ceasing dual‐purpose medication (DPM) with inadequate TTB and symptom relief, and continuing DPM with adequate TTB and symptom relief. De‐TOPPLE version 1 was developed and validated through two rounds of the Delphi process. Clinical use of the tool needs final validation following the addition of contextual statements to the tool.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology,Toxicology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3