Examination of validity of identifying congenital heart disease from hospital discharge data without a gold standard: Using a data linkage approach

Author:

He Wen‐Qiang1ORCID,Nassar Natasha1ORCID,Schneuer Francisco J.1ORCID,Lain Samantha J.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Child Population and Translational Health Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdministrative health data has been used extensively to examine congenital heart disease (CHD). However, the accuracy and completeness of these data must be assessed.ObjectivesTo use data linkage of multiple administrative data sources to examine the validity of identifying CHD cases recorded in hospital discharge data.MethodsWe identified all liveborn infants born 2013–2017 in New South Wales, Australia with a CHD diagnosis up to age one, recorded in hospital discharge data. Using record linkage to multiple data sources, the diagnosis of CHD was compared with five reference standards: (i) multiple hospital admissions containing CHD diagnosis; (ii) receiving a cardiac procedure; (iii) CHD diagnosis in the Register of Congenital Conditions; (iv) cardiac‐related outpatient health service recorded; and/or (v) cardiac‐related cause of death. Positive predictive values (PPV) comparing CHD diagnosis with the reference standards were estimated by CHD severity and for specific phenotypes.ResultsOf 485,239 liveborn infants, there were 4043 infants with a CHD diagnosis identified in hospital discharge data (8.3 per 1000 live births). The PPV for any CHD identified in any of the five methods was 62.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.9, 64.8), with PPV higher for severe CHD at 94.1% (95% CI 88.2, 100). Infant characteristics associated with higher PPVs included lower birthweight, presence of a syndrome or non‐cardiac congenital anomaly, born to mothers aged <20 years and residing in disadvantaged areas.ConclusionUsing data linkage of multiple datasets is a novel and cost‐effective method to examine the validity of CHD diagnoses recorded in one dataset. These results can be incorporated into bias analyses in future studies of CHD.

Funder

Financial Markets Foundation for Children

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Epidemiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3