Surveillance of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer with blue‐light cystoscopy: a meta‐analysis

Author:

Sari Motlagh Reza1ORCID,Ghoreifi Alireza2ORCID,Yanagisawa Takafumi13ORCID,Kawada Tatsushi14ORCID,Ahyai Sascha5,Merseburger Axel S.6,Abufaraj Mohammad78ORCID,Abern Michael9,Djaladat Hooman2ORCID,Daneshmand Siamak2ORCID,Shariat Shahrokh F.11011127

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA

3. Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

4. Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

5. Department of Urology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

6. Department of Urology, Campus Lübeck University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Lübeck Germany

7. Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

8. The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

9. Department of Urology Duke University Durham NC USA

10. Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

11. Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

12. Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the value of flexible blue‐light cystoscopy (BLC) vs flexible white‐light cystoscopy (WLC) in the surveillance setting of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).MethodsAll major databases were searched for articles published before May 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome was the accuracy of flexible BLC vs WLC in detecting bladder cancer recurrence among suspicious bladder lesions.ResultsA total of 10 articles, comprising 1634 patients, were deemed eligible for the quantitative synthesis. In the meta‐analysis focusing on the detection of disease recurrence, there was no difference between flexible BLC and WLC (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82–1.41)]; the risk difference (RD) showed 1% of flexible BLC, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 100. In the subgroup meta‐analysis of detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) only, there was again no significant difference between flexible BLC and WLC (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82–1.69), BLC was associated with a RD of 2% (NNT = 50). The positive predictive values for flexible BLC and WLC in detecting all types of recurrence were 72% and 66%, respectively, and for CIS they were 39% and 29%, respectively.ConclusionSurveillance of NMIBC with flexible BLC could detect more suspicious lesions and consequently more tumour recurrences compared to flexible WLC, with a increase in the rate of false positives leading to overtreatment. A total of 100 and 50 flexible BLC procedures would need to be performed to find on additional tumor and CIS recurences, respectively. A risk‐stratified strategy for patient selection could be considered when using flexible BLC for the surveillance of NMIBC patients.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3