The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study

Author:

Carroll Pádraig123ORCID,Smith Éimear4ORCID,Dervan Adrian2ORCID,McCarthy Ciarán5,Woods Ian2ORCID,Beirne Cliff6,Harte Geoff5,O'Flynn Dónal5,Quinlan John7ORCID,O'Brien Fergal J.23ORCID,Flood Michelle1238ORCID,Moriarty Frank1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dublin Ireland

2. Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG), Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dublin Ireland

3. Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (AMBER) Centre, Trinity College Dublin (TCD) RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dublin Ireland

4. National Rehabilitation Hospital Dublin Ireland

5. c/o Irish Rugby Football Union Charitable Trust Dublin Ireland

6. Sports Surgery Clinic Santry Dublin Ireland

7. Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght Dublin Ireland

8. RCSI PPI Ignite Network Office part of the National PPI Ignite Network based at the University of Galway Galway Ireland

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThere is currently limited guidance for researchers on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for preclinical spinal cord research, leading to uncertainty about design and implementation. This study aimed to develop evidence‐informed principles to support preclinical spinal cord researchers to incorporate PPI into their research.MethodsThis study used a modified Delphi method with the aim of establishing consensus on a set of principles for PPI in spinal cord research. Thirty‐eight stakeholders including researchers, clinicians and people living with spinal cord injury took part in the expert panel. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with a series of statements relating to PPI in preclinical spinal cord research over two rounds. As part of Round 2, they were also asked to rate statements as essential or desirable.ResultsThirty‐eight statements were included in Round 1, after which five statements were amended and two additional statements were added. After Round 2, consensus (> 75% agreement) was reached for a total of 27 principles, with 13 rated as essential and 14 rated as desirable. The principles with highest agreement related to diversity in representation among PPI contributors, clarity of the purpose of PPI and effective communication.ConclusionThis research developed a previously unavailable set of evidence‐informed principles to inform PPI in preclinical spinal cord research. These principles provide guidance for researchers seeking to conduct PPI in preclinical spinal cord research and may also inform PPI in other preclinical disciplines.Patient and Public Involvement StatementThis study was conducted as part of a project aiming to develop PPI in preclinical spinal cord injury research associated with an ongoing research collaboration funded by the Irish Rugby Football Union Charitable Trust (IRFU CT) and the Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (SFI AMBER), with research conducted by the Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG) at the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The project aims to develop an advanced biomaterials platform for spinal cord repair and includes a PPI Advisory Panel comprising researchers, clinicians and seriously injured rugby players to oversee the work of the project. PPI is included in this study through the involvement of members of the PPI Advisory Panel in the conceptualisation of this research, review of findings, identification of key points for discussion and preparation of the study manuscript as co‐authors.

Funder

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Publisher

Wiley

Reference53 articles.

1. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research

2. S.Denegri D.Evans M.Palm andS.Staniszewska “The History of INVOLVE: A Witness Seminar ” (International PPI Network [IPPIN] 2024) https://intppinetwork.wixsite.com/ippin.

3. “Guide to Patient and Public Involvement in HSE Research ” HSE updated 2021 https://hseresearch.ie/.

4. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review

5. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3