Epidemiology and clinical significance of carbapenemases in Australia: a narrative review

Abstract

AbstractCarbapenemase‐producing gram‐negative bacteria (CP‐GNB) infections threaten public health with high mortality, morbidity and treatment costs. Although frequencies remain low in Australia (total number of CP‐GNB infections reported was 907 in 2022), blaIMP‐4 has established low levels of endemicity in many states. Imipenemase metallo‐β‐lactamase types alone accounted for more than half of all carbapenemases in carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales isolates in Australia, particularly in Enterobacter cloacae complex. New Delhi metallo‐β‐lactamase constitutes almost 25% of all carbapenemases in Australia and was identified predominantly in Escherichia coli. The OXA‐48‐like carbapenemases include almost 10% of all carbapenemases and are mainly seen in Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli. Although K. pneumoniae carbapenemase‐type carbapenemases are rare in Australia, some local outbreaks have occurred. Most carbapenem‐resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Australia do not produce carbapenemases. Finally, OXA‐23‐like carbapenemases are overwhelmingly positive in CR‐Acinetobacter baumannii strains in Australia. Treatment of CR‐GNB infections challenges physicians. Of 10 new antibiotics active against at least some CR‐GNB infections that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, just three are approved for use in Australia. In this context, there is still an unmet need for novel antibacterials that can be used for the treatment of CR‐GNB infections in Australia, as well as a pressing requirement for new mechanisms to ‘de‐link’ antibiotic sales from their availability. In this narrative review, we aim to overview the epidemiology and clinical significance of carbapenem resistance in Australia as it pertains to Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.