Surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy using linked color imaging and narrow‐band imaging: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimThere has been no report on a direct comparison between linked color imaging (LCI) and second‐generation narrow‐band imaging (2G‐NBI) for surveillance of epithelial neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). The aim of this study was to verify the superiority of LCI to 2G‐NBI for surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy and to clarify how each endoscopic system should be used.MethodsThis study was conducted as an open‐label, two‐arm‐parallel (1:1), multicenter, randomized controlled trial at six institutions. Patients aged 20–85 years with a treatment history of epithelial neoplasms in the UGIT were recruited. Patients were assigned to a 2G‐NBI group and an LCI group, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed with primary image‐enhanced endoscopy followed by white light imaging (WLI). The primary endpoint was the detection rate of one or more epithelial neoplasms in the primary image‐enhanced endoscopy. A WLI‐detected epithelial neoplasm was defined as a lesion that was detected in only WLI.ResultsA total of 372 patients in the 2G‐NBI group and 378 patients in the LCI group were analyzed. Epithelial neoplasms in the UGIT were detected by 2G‐NBI in 18 patients (4.6%) and were detected by LCI in 20 patients (5.3%) (P = 0.87). WLI‐detected epithelial neoplasms were in 11 patients in the 2G‐NBI group (3.0%) and in 1 patient in the LCI group (0.27%) (P = 0.003).ConclusionsLinked color imaging did not show superiority to 2G‐NBI for the detection of epithelial neoplasms. Also, the percentage of WLI‐detected epithelial neoplasms in primary NBI was significantly higher than that in primary LCI.