Meta-analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Meta-analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts

Published:2008-07 Issue:4 Volume:53 Page:900-903
ISSN:0022-1198
Container-title:Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Dror Itiel,Rosenthal Robert

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00762.x/fullpdf

Reference11 articles.

1. Perception is far from perfection: the role of the brain and mind in constructing realities;Dror;Brain Behav Sci,2005

2. Why experts make errors;Dror;J Forensic Ident,2006

3. Visual-spatial abilities of pilots;Dror;J Appl Psychol,1993

4. The effects of screening, training, and experience of air force fighter pilots: the plasticity of the ability to extrapolate and track multiple objects in motion;Dror;North Am J Psychol,2004

Cited by 138 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The efficacy of Diamond™ nucleic acid dye-stained cell counting techniques for forensic application;Science & Justice;2024-11

2. GenAI mirage: The impostor bias and the deepfake detection challenge in the era of artificial illusions;Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation;2024-09

3. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology;Science & Justice;2024-07

4. Contextual bias by Forensic Document Examination trainees: An empirical study from China;Science & Justice;2024-07

5. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching;Behavior Research Methods;2024-03-14