Commentary: Technoference or parental phubbing? A call for greater conceptual and operational clarity of parental smartphone use around children

Author:

Frackowiak Michal12ORCID,Ochs Carli3ORCID,Wolfers Lara4ORCID,Vanden Abeele Mariek2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

2. imec‐mict‐UGent, Department of Communication Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium

3. Institute of Psychology University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland

4. Amsterdam School of Communication Research University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

Recent years have seen a widespread integration of technology into the daily lives of families. Psychological science has recently started to focus on the use of smartphones by parents while they are engaged in parenting activities, a behavior known under the terms “phubbing,” “technoference,” “parental screen distraction,” and various other terms. We argue that understanding the real impact of co‐present smartphone use by parents is inhibited by problems related to the conceptualization and methodology employed in empirical studies. In the present commentary, we identify the features of current research that may contribute to the theory crisis and hamper the progress of psychological research. Specifically, we discuss the implications of (a) inconsistent conceptualization of the phenomenon and (b) suboptimal operationalizations that may prevent us from understanding what is being studied and call for greater consideration of definitional clarity and valid operationalization in future research.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference50 articles.

1. The Psychology of Phubbing

2. Parent-adolescent congruence in phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: A moderated polynomial regression with response surface analyses

3. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research

4. Blackman A.(2015).Screen time for parents and caregivers: Parental screen distraction and parenting perceptions and beliefs – ProQuest. Available from:https://www.proquest.com/openview/a81e7baee4baae51aae88b2fa49ac984/1?pq‐origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

5. Face validity in psychological assessment: Implications for a unified model of validity.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3