Distal‐to‐proximal etiologically relevant variables associated with the general (p) and specific factors of psychopathology

Author:

Ormel Jonah1,Vos Melissa1ORCID,Laceulle Odilia M.2,Vrijen Charlotte3,van der Laan Camiel M.4,Nolte Ilja M.5,Hartman Catharina A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

2. Department of Developmental Psychology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

3. Department of Developmental Psychology University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

4. Department of Biological Psychology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

5. Department of Epidemiology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Abstract

BackgroundThe general factor of psychopathology, often denoted as p, captures the common variance among a broad range of psychiatric symptoms. Specific factors are co‐modeled based on subsets of closely related symptoms. This paper investigated the extent to which wide‐ranging genetic, personal, and environmental etiologically relevant variables are associated with p and specific psychopathology factors.MethodsUsing data from four waves (ages 11–19) of TRAILS, we modeled a bifactor model of p and four specific factors [internalizing, externalizing, ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)]. Next, we examined the associations of 19 etiologically relevant variables with these psychology factors using path models that organized the variables according to the distal‐to‐proximal risk principle.ResultsCollectively, the etiologically relevant factors, including temperament traits, accounted for 55% of p's variance, 46% in ADHD, 35% in externalizing, 19% in internalizing, and 7% in ASD. The low 7% is due to insufficient unique variance in ASD indicators that load more strongly on p. Excluding temperament, variables accounted for 29% variance in p, 9% ADHD, 14% EXT, 7% INT, and 4% ASD. Most etiologically relevant factors were generic, predicting p. In addition, we identified effects on specific factors in addition to effects on p (e.g., parental SES, executive functioning); only effects on specific factors (e.g., parental rejection); opposite effects on different factors [e.g., diurnal cortisol (high INT but low EXT, p); developmental delay (high ASD and p but low EXT)]. Frustration, family functioning, parental psychopathology, executive functioning, and fearfulness had strong effects on p.Conclusions(1) Strong generic effects on p suggest that etiologically relevant factors and psychopathology tend to cluster in persons. (2) While many factors predict p, additional as well as opposite effects on specific factors indicate the relevance of specific psychopathology factors in understanding mental disorder. (3) High frustration, neurodevelopmental problems, and a disadvantaged family environment primarily characterize p.

Funder

Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen

ZonMw

European Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3