Affiliation:
1. Regulatory Ecotoxicology Chemicals BASF SE Ludwigshafen Germany
2. Regulatory Toxicology & Ecotoxicology BASF Services Europe GmbH Berlin Germany
3. Technical Service/Global Technical Center S.C. BASF Grenzach GmbH Grenzach‐Wyhlen Germany
4. Product Stewardship & EHS Data Management BASF Personal Care and Nutrition GmbH Monheim Germany
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this work was to review the principals of environmental hazard and risk assessment (ERA) of cosmetic UV filters registered under EU REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals). Furthermore, effects as obtained from non‐standardized testing methods and organisms from scientific literature were compared against the predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) as derived based on standardized test methods for the various environmental compartments under REACH.MethodsThe REACH dossiers at the ECHA webpage were screened for available information related to basic physico–chemical data (i.e. water solubility, octanol–water partitioning coefficient), PNECs and associated data (data basis, assessment factors (AFs)). Scientific literature was screened for available ecotoxicity data and the adverse effect levels were compared against the derived PNECs under REACH. Current approaches for environmental risk assessments of UV filters were evaluated for its applicability for a direct release scenario.ResultsUnder REACH, PNECs were derived for all hazardous UV filters. Although, PNECs were often derived for various environmental compartments (i.e. freshwater, marine water, sediment, soil), results from literature focused on aquatic data. Effects as observed within scientific literature matches in principle with the hazardous profile of the UV filters. Effects levels both on the acute and the chronic toxicity as retrieved from the non‐standardized test organisms (literature) were above the derived PNECs under REACH. Currently, ERAs performed for cosmetic UV filters under REACH are solely tonnage driven and thus do not fully capture the use in sunscreens and associated leisure activities.ConclusionExisting EU REACH regulation is considered as sufficient to evaluate the environmental safety of UV filters used in sunscreens. To cover the direct release of UV filters due to various leisure activities into the aquatic freshwater and marine environment, an additional application‐based ERA is considered necessary.
Subject
Colloid and Surface Chemistry,Dermatology,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Aging,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference56 articles.
1. RichardsonK SteffenW SchellnhuberHJ AlcamoJ BarkerT KammenDM et al.Climate change: global risks challenges and decisions – synthesis report. University of Copenhagen2009.
2. Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources
3. Food security and sustainable resource management;McLaughlin D;Water Resour Res,2015
4. Seabirds, gyres and global trends in plastic pollution
5. Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre;Lebreton L;Sci Rep,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献