Cosmetic UV filters in the environment—state of the art in EU regulations, science and possible knowledge gaps

Author:

Pawlowski Sascha1ORCID,Luetjens Laura Henriette1,Preibisch Alina2,Acker Stephanie3,Petersen‐Thiery Mechtild4

Affiliation:

1. Regulatory Ecotoxicology Chemicals BASF SE Ludwigshafen Germany

2. Regulatory Toxicology & Ecotoxicology BASF Services Europe GmbH Berlin Germany

3. Technical Service/Global Technical Center S.C. BASF Grenzach GmbH Grenzach‐Wyhlen Germany

4. Product Stewardship & EHS Data Management BASF Personal Care and Nutrition GmbH Monheim Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this work was to review the principals of environmental hazard and risk assessment (ERA) of cosmetic UV filters registered under EU REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals). Furthermore, effects as obtained from non‐standardized testing methods and organisms from scientific literature were compared against the predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) as derived based on standardized test methods for the various environmental compartments under REACH.MethodsThe REACH dossiers at the ECHA webpage were screened for available information related to basic physico–chemical data (i.e. water solubility, octanol–water partitioning coefficient), PNECs and associated data (data basis, assessment factors (AFs)). Scientific literature was screened for available ecotoxicity data and the adverse effect levels were compared against the derived PNECs under REACH. Current approaches for environmental risk assessments of UV filters were evaluated for its applicability for a direct release scenario.ResultsUnder REACH, PNECs were derived for all hazardous UV filters. Although, PNECs were often derived for various environmental compartments (i.e. freshwater, marine water, sediment, soil), results from literature focused on aquatic data. Effects as observed within scientific literature matches in principle with the hazardous profile of the UV filters. Effects levels both on the acute and the chronic toxicity as retrieved from the non‐standardized test organisms (literature) were above the derived PNECs under REACH. Currently, ERAs performed for cosmetic UV filters under REACH are solely tonnage driven and thus do not fully capture the use in sunscreens and associated leisure activities.ConclusionExisting EU REACH regulation is considered as sufficient to evaluate the environmental safety of UV filters used in sunscreens. To cover the direct release of UV filters due to various leisure activities into the aquatic freshwater and marine environment, an additional application‐based ERA is considered necessary.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Colloid and Surface Chemistry,Dermatology,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Aging,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference56 articles.

1. RichardsonK SteffenW SchellnhuberHJ AlcamoJ BarkerT KammenDM et al.Climate change: global risks challenges and decisions – synthesis report. University of Copenhagen2009.

2. Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources

3. Food security and sustainable resource management;McLaughlin D;Water Resour Res,2015

4. Seabirds, gyres and global trends in plastic pollution

5. Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre;Lebreton L;Sci Rep,2022

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3