Macroscale analyses suggest invasive plant impacts depend more on the composition of invading plants than on environmental context

Author:

Beaury Evelyn M.1ORCID,Sofaer Helen R.2ORCID,Early Regan3ORCID,Pearse Ian S.4ORCID,Blumenthal Dana M.5ORCID,Corbin Jeffrey D.6ORCID,Diez Jeffrey7,Dukes Jeffrey S.8ORCID,Barnett David T.9ORCID,Ibáñez Inés10ORCID,Petri Laís10ORCID,Vilà Montserrat1112,Bradley Bethany A.113ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts USA

2. U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center Hawaii National Park Hawaii County Hawaii USA

3. Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn Cornwall UK

4. U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA

5. Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources & Systems Research Unit U.S. Department of Agriculture Colorado Fort Collins USA

6. Department of Biological Sciences Union College Schenectady New York USA

7. Department of Biology Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon Eugene Oregon USA

8. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

9. Battelle, National Ecological Observatory Network Boulder Colorado USA

10. School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

11. Department of Integrative Ecology Doñana Biological Station, (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain

12. Department of Plant Biology and Ecology University of Sevilla Sevilla Spain

13. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractAimNative biodiversity is threatened by the spread of non‐native invasive species. Many studies demonstrate that invasions reduce local biodiversity but we lack an understanding of how impacts vary across environments at the macroscale. Using ~11,500 vegetation surveys from ecosystems across the United States, we quantified how the relationship between non‐native plant cover and native plant diversity varied across different compositions of invading plants (measured by non‐native plant richness and evenness) and environmental contexts (measured by productivity and human activity).LocationContinental United States.Time PeriodSurveys from 1990s‐present.Major Taxa StudiedTerrestrial plant communities.MethodsWe fit mixed effects models to understand how native plant richness, diversity and evenness varied with non‐native cover. We tested how this relationship varied when non‐native cover interacted with non‐native plant richness and evenness, and with productivity and human activity.ResultsAcross the United States, communities with greater cover of non‐native plants had lower native plant richness and diversity but higher evenness, suggesting rare native plants can be lost while dominant plants decline in abundance. The relationship between non‐native cover and native community diversity varied with non‐native plant richness and evenness but was not associated with productivity and human activity. Negative associations were strongest in areas with low non‐native richness and evenness, characterizing plant communities that were invaded by a dominant non‐native plant.Main ConclusionsNon‐native plant cover provides a first approximation of invasion impacts on native community diversity, but the magnitude of impact depended on non‐native plant richness and evenness. Relationships between non‐native cover and native diversity were consistent in strength across continental scale gradients of productivity and human activity. Therefore, at the macroscale, invasive plant impacts on native plant communities likely depend more on the characteristics of the invading plants, that is the presence of a dominant invader, than on the environmental context.

Funder

National Science Foundation

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis

U.S. Geological Survey

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Global and Planetary Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3