Affiliation:
1. Center for Resilience in Agricultural Working Landscapes University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln NE 68583 U.S.A.
2. Department of Geography University of Zurich Zurich 8057 Switzerland
3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence KS 66045 U.S.A.
4. Kansas Biological Survey and Center for Ecological Research University of Kansas Lawrence KS 66045 U.S.A.
Abstract
Choosing restoration strategies may depend on ecosystem's stability properties. When degraded ecosystems do not self‐perpetuate, natural regeneration can lead to system recovery, and restoration interventions are often designed to accelerate the natural regeneration process. However, when degraded systems self‐perpetuate, reestablishing functional ecosystems depends on overcoming resistance thresholds that impede recovery. In both scenarios, concentrating restoration efforts in patches of the desired state may enhance ecosystem recovery. Introducing patches of a desired state has been motivated by two frameworks: autocatalytic nucleation and the analogy to nucleation. When restoration depends on overcoming resistance thresholds, autocatalytic nucleation lowers restoration barriers by initiating a local positive feedback mechanism that is only successful when desired patches are introduced above a critical patch size. In contrast, the analogy to nucleation accelerates natural regeneration whereby desired patches interact with landscape scale factors often through directed dispersal. We compare nucleation frameworks, and discuss their applications for restoration practices.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献