Large‐scale one‐off sea urchin removal promotes rapid kelp recovery in urchin barrens

Author:

Miller Kelsey I.1ORCID,Balemi Celia A.1,Bell Daria R.12,Blain Caitlin O.1,Caiger Paul E.1,Hanns Benn J.1,Kulins Sara E.1,Peleg Ohad13,Spyksma Arie J. P.14,Shears Nick T.1

Affiliation:

1. Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science University of Auckland 160 Goat Island Road Leigh 0985 New Zealand

2. Marine Science University of Waikato Tauranga New Zealand

3. Coastal Ecology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington 398 The Esplanade, Island Bay Wellington 6023 New Zealand

4. New Zealand Geographic Auckland New Zealand

Abstract

Sea urchin overgrazing is a leading cause of kelp forest loss and in such cases their removal is increasingly advocated for kelp forest restoration. However, refining removal approaches is needed to improve the efficiency and success of restoration, as most previous removal studies have been small scale and require ongoing removals to maintain low densities and allow kelp recovery. We investigated the effectiveness of one‐off urchin removal from large, semi‐discrete areas of urchin barrens as a tool to promote kelp recovery. We removed sea urchins (Evechinus chloroticus) from four areas (1.6–2 ha) of urchin barrens in northeastern New Zealand. Exposed urchins were reduced to approximately 7% of initial densities and remained low, yet cryptic urchin densities increased after 2 years. Kelp (Ecklonia radiata) and fucoid (Sargassum sinclairii, Carpophyllum spp.) densities increased rapidly in removal areas, but remained constant or declined in adjacent control urchin barren areas. Macroalgal canopy recovery varied among and within removal areas, but increased on average from approximately 5 to 43% in 2 years. Densities of large sea urchin predators did not increase with kelp recovery, likely due to ongoing fishing within removal areas. Our results demonstrate that a single urchin removal from large, semi‐discrete areas of urchin barrens can effectively and efficiently promote rapid multi‐species macroalgal recovery without additional actions (e.g. repeated urchin removals or macroalgae enhancement) for at least 2 years. However, this approach does not restore whole ecosystems and consequently restoration benefits through kelp recovery will be temporary without longer‐term urchin management and/or rebuilding of predator populations.

Funder

George Mason Centre for the Natural Environment, University of Auckland

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3