Diagnostic testing in children: A qualitative study of pediatricians' considerations

Author:

Ropers Fabienne G.1ORCID,Rietveld Sophie1,Rings Edmond H. H. M.12,Bossuyt Patrick M. M.34,van Bodegom‐ Vos Leti5,Hillen Marij A.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics Willem‐Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

2. Department of Pediatrics Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

3. Amsterdam University Medical Centers University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology & Data Science Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology Amsterdam The Netherlands

5. Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

6. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Medical Psychology Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAims and ObjectivesStudies in adult medicine have shown that physicians base testing decisions on the patient's clinical condition but also consider other factors, including local practice or patient expectations. In pediatrics, physicians and parents jointly decide on behalf of a (young) child. This might demand more explicit and more complex deliberations, with sometimes conflicting interests. We explored pediatricians' considerations in diagnostic test ordering and the factors that influence their deliberation.MethodWe performed in‐depth, semistructured interviews with a purposively selected heterogeneous sample of 20 Dutch pediatricians. We analyzed transcribed interviews inductively using a constant comparative approach, and clustered data across interviews to derive common themes.ResultsPediatricians perceived test‐related burden in children higher compared with adults, and reported that avoiding an unjustified burden causes them to be more restrictive and deliberate in test ordering. They felt conflicted when parents desired testing or when guidelines recommended diagnostic tests pediatricians perceived as unnecessary. When parents demanded testing, they would explore parental concern, educate parents about harms and alternative explanations of symptoms, and advocate watchful waiting. Yet they reported sometimes performing tests to appease parents or to comply with guidelines, because of feared personal consequences in the case of adverse outcomes.ConclusionWe obtained an overview of the considerations that are weighed in pediatric test decisions. The comparatively strong focus on prevention of harm motivates pediatricians to critically appraise the added value of testing and drivers of low‐value testing. Pediatricians' relatively restrictive approach to testing could provide an example for other disciplines. Improved guidelines and physician and patient education could help to withstand the perceived pressure to test.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference87 articles.

1. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care

2. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care Board on Health Care Services Institute of Medicine The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine.The diagnostic process. In Balogh EP Miller BT Ball JR eds. National Academies Press;2015:31‐80.

3. Our Stubborn Quest for Diagnostic Certainty

4. The Threshold Approach to Clinical Decision Making

5. Understanding the Medical and Nonmedical Value of Diagnostic Testing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3