Synthesis of ‘joint class’ curricula at high volume joint replacement centres and a preliminary model for development and evaluation

Abstract

AbstractRationalePreoperative patient education through ‘joint class’ has potential to improve quality of care for total joint replacement (TJR). However, no formal guidance exists regarding curriculum content, potentially resulting in inter‐institutional variation.ObjectiveWe aimed to (a) synthesize curriculum components of ‘joint classes’ across high‐volume institutions and (b) develop a preliminary theory of change model for development and evaluation guided by the existing curricula and related literature.MethodsWe reviewed ‘joint class’ curricula from the websites of the 10 highest‐volume TJR centres (by average annual 2017–2019 volume) that publicly disclosed this information. Two reviewers qualitatively compared available content and noted common categories, which were synthesized into key domains across institutions. We then reviewed the PubMed database for literature on pre‐TJR patient education and education needs in the past 10 years. Drawing on our curriculum synthesis and related literature, we proposed a theory of change model: hypothesized mechanisms through which ‘joint class’ confers benefits to patients and health systems.ResultsWe identified 30 categories in our review of existing class content, which we synthesized into seven key domains: (I) Practical Elements, (II) Logistics, (III) Medical Information, (IV) Modifiable Risk Factors, (V) Expected Outcomes, (VI) Patient Role in Recovery and (VII) Enhanced Education. Variation across institutions was noted. Our preliminary model based on the curriculum synthesis and related literature on the impact of ‘joint class’ includes three levels: (1) Practical Elements (‘joint class’ accessibility and information quality), (2) Class Goals (increased health literacy, increased adherence, risk mitigation, realistic expectations, and reduced anxiety) and (3) Target Outcomes (improved clinical outcomes, positive patient experience and increased patient satisfaction).ConclusionOur synthesis identified core common topics included in pre‐TJR education but also highlighted variation across institutions, supporting opportunities for standardization. Clinicians and researchers can use our preliminary model to systematically develop and evaluate ‘joint classes,’ with the goal of establishing a standard of care for TJR preoperative education.