A Command Gap? A Practitioner's Analysis of the Value of Comparisons Between the UK's Military and Emergency Services' Command and Control Models in the Context of UK Resilience Operations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Command Gap? A Practitioner's Analysis of the Value of Comparisons Between the UK's Military and Emergency Services' Command and Control Models in the Context of UK Resilience Operations

Published:2008-12 Issue:4 Volume:16 Page:186-194
ISSN:0966-0879
Container-title:Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Arbuthnot Kevin

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Management Information Systems

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00549.x/fullpdf

Reference28 articles.

1. Cabinet Office (2002), Report on Exercise Capital Response, Held on 18-19 October 2002, London, http://www.ukresilience.info/preparedness/exercises/londoncasestudies/capital_response.aspx (29 September 2008).

2. Cabinet Office (2005a), ‘Emergency Response and Recovery’, EPC Easingwold (This is Non-Statutory Guidance to the Civil Contingencies Act 2004), http://www.ukresilience.gov.uk/response.aspx (29 September 2008).

3. Cabinet Office (2005b), ‘Central Government Arrangements for Responding to an Emergency: Concept of Operations’. HM Government Civil Contingencies Secretariat, March 2005.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From ideal to reality: governance of AMR in a multi-level setting;Journal of European Public Policy;2024-09-10

2. Interoperability and standardization: lessons from the fruit-bowl;Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal;2021-10-08

3. Preface;Hyper-active Governance;2019-06-27

4. Index;Hyper-active Governance;2019-06-27

5. Notes;Hyper-active Governance;2019-06-27