Results of patch testing with five fragrance materials hitherto not tested: A dose‐finding study in the clinical population

Author:

Sukakul Thanisorn1ORCID,Uter Wolfgang2ORCID,Gonçalo Margarida3ORCID,Huggard Joseph45,Ljubojević Hadžavdić Suzana6ORCID,Schuttelaar Marie L. A.7ORCID,Svedman Cecilia1ORCID,Vey Matthias45,Isaksson Marléne1ORCID,Niklasson Bo8,Rustemeyer Thomas9ORCID,Bruze Magnus1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Lund University Malmö Sweden

2. Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology University of Erlangen/Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

3. Department of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal

4. The Huggard Consulting Group, S.A.R.L. Itzig Luxembourg

5. IFRA VP Scientific Affairs and IDEA Management Team Brussels Belgium

6. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine University of Zagreb University Hospital Center Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

7. Department of Dermatology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

8. Chemotechnique Diagnostics Vellinge Sweden

9. Department of Dermatology‐Allergology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundQuantitative risk assessment (QRA) for skin sensitization is used to derive safe use levels of sensitising fragrance ingredients in products. Post‐marketing surveillance of the prevalence of contact allergy to these ingredients provides relevant data to help evaluate the performance of these measures.ObjectivesTo determine a suitable patch test concentration for five fragrance materials that had hitherto not been tested on a regular basis. These concentrations are then to be used in a surveillance study with patch testing consecutive patients over an extended monitoring period.Materials and MethodsFuraneol, CAS.3658‐77‐3; trans‐2‐hexenal, CAS.6728‐26‐3; 4,8‐dimethyl‐4,9‐decadienal, CAS.71077‐31‐1; longifolene, CAS.475‐20‐7; benzaldehyde, CAS.10052‐7, were patch tested with other fragrance allergens in four clinics. Patch testing was conducted in three rounds, starting with the lowest concentrations of the five ingredients. The doses were increased in the subsequent rounds if no late‐appearing positive reactions and virtually no irritant reactions were reported.ResultsOverall, 373 patients were tested. No positive allergic reaction was reported to the five ingredients. Patch test results of other fragrance allergens are reported.ConclusionsThe highest test concentrations are each considered safe for patch testing consecutive patients. Further surveillance based on these preparations will evaluate the hypothesis that QRA‐driven consumer product levels of these fragrances can prevent sensitization.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3