A mixed methods systematic review exploring infant feeding experiences and support in women with severe mental illness

Author:

Baker Natasha1ORCID,Bick Debra2ORCID,Bamber Louise3,Wilson Claire A.13ORCID,Howard Louise M.1ORCID,Bakolis Ioannis4ORCID,Soukup Tayana56ORCID,Chang Yan‐Shing7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

2. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick Coventry UK

3. Child and Maternal Mental Health Team, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK

4. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics & Health Service and Population Research Department, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

5. Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK

6. Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

7. Methodologies Research Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractThere are many benefits of breastfeeding to women and their infants but meeting the recommended 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding is likely to be more challenging for women with severe mental illness (SMI). This is the first systematic review that aims to examine evidence of (a) infant feeding outcomes in women with SMI and the factors associated with this, (b) the experiences of infant feeding and infant feeding support for women with SMI, (c) interventions for supporting infant feeding among these women and (d) health care professionals' attitudes toward supporting infant feeding in women with SMI. Mixed methods systematic review was carried out using the principles of Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) 'convergent integrated' methodology. CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline and MIDIRS were used to search literature between 1994 and 2022. The quality of selected articles was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools and thematic synthesis was undertaken to obtain findings. Eighteen papers were included in the final review. Women with SMI were less likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding than women without SMI. Several challenges with breastfeeding were highlighted, and while these were often linked to women's mental health difficulties, inconsistent advice from health care professionals and poor support with breastfeeding further compounded these challenges. This review highlights that policy and practice need to take into account the individual challenges women with SMI face when planning, initiating and maintaining breastfeeding. Education and training for health care professionals are needed to enable them to provide tailored infant feeding support to women with SMI, which reflects their individual needs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3