The Italian version of the 16‐item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ‐16) and its psychometric features in help‐seeking ultra‐high‐risk subjects and in the general population

Author:

Parabiaghi Alberto1ORCID,Rossi Alessandro Alberto23ORCID,Castelnovo Anna456ORCID,del Fabro Lorenzo78ORCID,Mannarini Stefania23ORCID,Percudani Mauro Emilio89,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy, Unit for Quality of Care and Rights Promotion in Mental Health Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Milan Italy

2. Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, Section of Applied Psychology University of Padova Padova Italy

3. Interdepartmental Center for Family Research University of Padova Padova Italy

4. Sleep Medicine Unit Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland Lugano Switzerland

5. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland

6. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Bern Bern Switzerland

7. Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation University of Milan Milan Italy

8. Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan Milan Italy

9. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Niguarda" Milan Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing attention to the early stages of psychosis and the identification of symptomatic prodromal states have led to the development of a growing number of screening tools. The 16‐item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ‐16) is a worldwide used self‐administered tool for this purpose. However, to date, fundamental psychometric properties of PQ‐16 were not thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to examine the structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability and other psychometrical properties of the Italian version of the PQ‐16 (iPQ‐16) in help‐seeking individuals and in the general population.MethodsThe iPQ‐16 was administered to 449 young outpatients attending six community mental health services and to 318 control participants enrolled in educational environment. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), measurement invariance (MI) between the help‐seeking group and the general population sample, convergent validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and prevalence analyses were performed. Lastly, the validity of the adopted PQ‐16 cut‐offs through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves plotted against CAARMS diagnoses was also tested.ResultsCFAs confirmed the single‐factor structure for the iPQ‐16 and scalar MI was reached. The iPQ‐16 showed high internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent validity, and acceptable diagnostic accuracy. ROC analysis suggested a score of ≥4 as best cut‐off.ConclusionsThe iPQ‐16 represents a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of high mental risk in both Italian outpatients and general student population. It has good psychometric properties and is easy to implement as UHR screening for clinical as well as research purposes.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3